Rare Earths Explained: Why U.S.–China Supply Tensions Matter for Tech and Defense Stocks

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Rare earth stocks are attracting attention again as tensions between the United States and China expose a major weakness in global technology and defense supply chains.

Rare earth elements are used in everything from semiconductors and electric vehicles to radar systems, missiles and aircraft.

The problem is concentration.

China accounted for roughly 85% of global rare-earth refining in 2025, giving it enormous influence over how these materials reach global manufacturers.

That makes rare earths much more than a mining story.

They are increasingly a technology, defense and geopolitical supply-chain issue.

What Are Rare Earths?

Rare earths are a group of metallic elements with unusual magnetic, electrical and heat-resistant properties.

They are often used in very small quantities, but those small quantities can be essential.

Important examples include:

  • neodymium
  • dysprosium
  • terbium
  • yttrium
  • samarium

Many are used to manufacture powerful permanent magnets or specialized components.

That means a relatively small disruption in supply can affect a much larger finished product.

Why Does China Matter So Much?

The main issue is not simply where rare-earth minerals are mined.

Processing and refining are even more important.

China has spent decades building expertise and industrial capacity across the rare-earth supply chain.

Even after new U.S. and Malaysian investment, China’s share of global rare-earth refining only fell from more than 90% in 2023 to around 85% in 2025. The International Energy Agency estimates that China could still control roughly 70%–73% of refining in 2035 even if planned global projects are completed.

That means diversification will take years.

Why Are U.S.–China Tensions Important?

Rare earths have increasingly become part of trade negotiations.

Some Chinese suppliers have recently refused to ship rare-earth materials to U.S. companies because they fear becoming caught between American and Chinese restrictions.

Reuters reports that U.S. companies in aerospace, semiconductors and other sensitive industries are still struggling to obtain some materials.

Rare-earth access is expected to be discussed when U.S. President Donald Trump meets Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington on September 24.

The market risk is straightforward:

export restrictions → lower supply → higher prices → production delays

Why Tech Companies Care

Rare earths and related critical minerals appear throughout the technology supply chain.

They can be found in:

  • advanced electronics
  • semiconductor equipment
  • data centers
  • electric motors
  • smartphones
  • renewable-energy systems

Yttrium, for example, is used in semiconductor and aerospace applications, while rare-earth magnets are essential in many high-performance motors.

A shortage does not necessarily stop production immediately.

But companies may need to:

  • pay higher prices
  • hold larger inventories
  • redesign products
  • qualify alternative suppliers

All of those responses can raise costs.

Why Defense Stocks Are Especially Exposed

Defense supply chains have even less room for substitution.

Heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium are used in high-performance magnets needed for applications including fighter aircraft, missile guidance and radar systems.

That makes supply security strategically important.

Lockheed Martin has already been exploring purchases of critical minerals from U.S. mines as Washington pushes defense contractors to reduce dependence on Chinese supply.

For defense companies, the issue is not simply the price of the raw material.

It is whether enough material is available to maintain production schedules.

Why Rare Earth Stocks Can Benefit

Supply concerns can create opportunities for producers outside China.

If governments and manufacturers want alternative sources, they may support new:

  • mines
  • processing facilities
  • magnet plants
  • long-term supply agreements

The U.S. government has invested directly in companies including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth and other critical-mineral projects as part of efforts to build domestic supply.

This creates potential demand for companies positioned to supply non-Chinese materials.

But investors should be careful.

Rare-earth projects can take years to permit, finance and build.

Why Higher Prices Are Not Always Good

A supply shortage can push rare-earth prices higher.

That may help existing producers.

But very high prices can also encourage:

new supply + recycling + substitution + product redesign

The sector is therefore still cyclical.

A company may appear extremely valuable during a shortage, only for prices to weaken once new production arrives.

This is why investors need to distinguish between:

temporary scarcity

and

sustainable competitive advantage

Can the U.S. Reduce Its Dependence on China?

Yes, but not quickly.

The United States is expanding domestic mining and processing, financing new projects and building strategic inventories.

However, refining remains a major bottleneck.

The IEA expects global demand for critical minerals to at least double by 2040, which means new supply must grow while demand is also rising.

That makes diversification harder.

The challenge is not simply replacing today’s Chinese supply.

It is building enough new supply for tomorrow’s larger market.

What Could Ease the Risk?

Several developments could reduce pressure:

Improved U.S.–China trade relations
More predictable export licences could improve supply.

New Western refining capacity
Additional processing outside China would reduce concentration.

Recycling
Recovering rare earths from existing products could supplement mining.

Material substitution
Companies may redesign products to use fewer constrained elements.

But all of these solutions require time.

What Should Investors Watch?

The most useful signals are Chinese export controls, rare-earth prices, U.S.–China negotiations, new mining projects, refining capacity and defense procurement.

The central issue is simple:

Rare earths are inexpensive compared with many finished products, but without them those products may be impossible to manufacture.

That gives relatively small parts of the global commodity market enormous strategic importance.

For technology and defense companies, supply security may therefore matter just as much as the price of the material itself.

And for rare earth stocks, the key question is whether global diversification creates sustainable demand for new producers—or simply a temporary investment boom.

Analyze Macro Trends With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro tools help users study changing supply-chain risks, economic regimes and market trends rather than reacting to individual geopolitical headlines.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Falling AI Token Costs: Why Cheaper AI Could Drive Another Wave of Chip Demand

    AI is becoming dramatically cheaper to use. That could create more—not less—demand for chips. Silicon Data’s benchmark for the cost of one million AI tokens stood at about $0.97 on August 31, down from roughly $2.07 in May. That is a decline of more than 50% in only a few months. The important question is:…

  • Singapore STI Watch: Why Banks, Shipbuilders and Semiconductor Stocks Are Driving the Market

    Singapore stocks have had a powerful 2026—but the strength is not evenly spread across the market. The Straits Times Index closed at 5,718.02 on September 14, gaining 0.4% for the session. Yangzijiang Shipbuilding led the blue-chip gainers, while DBS, OCBC and UOB all finished higher. Yet across the wider market, 312 stocks fell versus 235…

  • Singapore Data Center REITs Bet on Japan: Is Power Scarcity Creating a New Growth Trade?

    Singapore-listed data center REITs are increasing their exposure to Japan as AI and cloud demand collide with a shortage of power-ready facilities. Keppel DC REIT recently proposed buying two Tokyo data centers, while Digital Core REIT increased its stake in an Osaka facility. The opportunity looks attractive. But the same power shortage supporting asset values…

  • SGX Crypto Perpetual Futures: What Singapore’s Institutional Crypto Push Means for Bitcoin and Ether

    Singapore Exchange is pushing deeper into institutional crypto trading. SGX already offers Bitcoin and Ethereum perpetual futures, launched in November 2025. Now it is preparing to offer those contracts to U.S. institutional investors, after filing with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in August 2026. That matters because perpetual futures have traditionally been dominated by crypto-native…

  • S-REITs vs Singapore Banks: Where Is the Better Yield in 2026?

    Singapore income investors have an interesting choice in 2026: S-REITs or bank stocks? S-REITs currently yield about 6.2% on average, compared with roughly 4% for Singapore’s three major banks—DBS, OCBC and UOB. That makes REITs look more attractive on headline yield. But yield alone does not tell you which investment offers the better risk-reward. Educational…

  • Singapore Semiconductor Stocks Rally: Can AEM, UMS and Frencken Keep Running?

    Singapore semiconductor stocks have become some of the SGX’s strongest performers in 2026. AEM, UMS Integration and Frencken have surged as investors bet that artificial intelligence will drive another wave of semiconductor spending. The Business Times reported that the three stocks had gained roughly 65% to more than 400% this year by early September. The…

  • Position Sizing Explained: Why Managing Risk Can Matter More Than Predicting the Market

    You can be right about a stock and still lose too much money. You can also be wrong several times and still preserve your portfolio. The difference often comes down to position sizing. Position sizing means deciding how much capital to allocate to a trade or investment. It is one of the simplest ways to…

  • Drawdown Recovery Explained: Why a 50% Loss Requires a 100% Gain

    Large losses are harder to recover from than many investors realize. If an investment falls 50%, it does not need a 50% gain to recover. It needs a 100% gain. That is because the recovery starts from a much smaller base. This simple idea is one of the most important lessons in risk management. Educational…

  • Sector Rotation Explained: Why Market Leadership Changes When Rates and Inflation Move

    The strongest part of the stock market does not stay the same forever. Technology may lead for months. Then energy, banks, industrials or defensive sectors can take over. This change in leadership is called sector rotation. It happens because different industries respond differently to: Understanding sector rotation can help explain why the overall market may…