Rare Earths Explained: Why U.S.–China Supply Tensions Matter for Tech and Defense Stocks

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Rare earth stocks are attracting attention again as tensions between the United States and China expose a major weakness in global technology and defense supply chains.

Rare earth elements are used in everything from semiconductors and electric vehicles to radar systems, missiles and aircraft.

The problem is concentration.

China accounted for roughly 85% of global rare-earth refining in 2025, giving it enormous influence over how these materials reach global manufacturers.

That makes rare earths much more than a mining story.

They are increasingly a technology, defense and geopolitical supply-chain issue.

What Are Rare Earths?

Rare earths are a group of metallic elements with unusual magnetic, electrical and heat-resistant properties.

They are often used in very small quantities, but those small quantities can be essential.

Important examples include:

  • neodymium
  • dysprosium
  • terbium
  • yttrium
  • samarium

Many are used to manufacture powerful permanent magnets or specialized components.

That means a relatively small disruption in supply can affect a much larger finished product.

Why Does China Matter So Much?

The main issue is not simply where rare-earth minerals are mined.

Processing and refining are even more important.

China has spent decades building expertise and industrial capacity across the rare-earth supply chain.

Even after new U.S. and Malaysian investment, China’s share of global rare-earth refining only fell from more than 90% in 2023 to around 85% in 2025. The International Energy Agency estimates that China could still control roughly 70%–73% of refining in 2035 even if planned global projects are completed.

That means diversification will take years.

Why Are U.S.–China Tensions Important?

Rare earths have increasingly become part of trade negotiations.

Some Chinese suppliers have recently refused to ship rare-earth materials to U.S. companies because they fear becoming caught between American and Chinese restrictions.

Reuters reports that U.S. companies in aerospace, semiconductors and other sensitive industries are still struggling to obtain some materials.

Rare-earth access is expected to be discussed when U.S. President Donald Trump meets Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington on September 24.

The market risk is straightforward:

export restrictions → lower supply → higher prices → production delays

Why Tech Companies Care

Rare earths and related critical minerals appear throughout the technology supply chain.

They can be found in:

  • advanced electronics
  • semiconductor equipment
  • data centers
  • electric motors
  • smartphones
  • renewable-energy systems

Yttrium, for example, is used in semiconductor and aerospace applications, while rare-earth magnets are essential in many high-performance motors.

A shortage does not necessarily stop production immediately.

But companies may need to:

  • pay higher prices
  • hold larger inventories
  • redesign products
  • qualify alternative suppliers

All of those responses can raise costs.

Why Defense Stocks Are Especially Exposed

Defense supply chains have even less room for substitution.

Heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium are used in high-performance magnets needed for applications including fighter aircraft, missile guidance and radar systems.

That makes supply security strategically important.

Lockheed Martin has already been exploring purchases of critical minerals from U.S. mines as Washington pushes defense contractors to reduce dependence on Chinese supply.

For defense companies, the issue is not simply the price of the raw material.

It is whether enough material is available to maintain production schedules.

Why Rare Earth Stocks Can Benefit

Supply concerns can create opportunities for producers outside China.

If governments and manufacturers want alternative sources, they may support new:

  • mines
  • processing facilities
  • magnet plants
  • long-term supply agreements

The U.S. government has invested directly in companies including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth and other critical-mineral projects as part of efforts to build domestic supply.

This creates potential demand for companies positioned to supply non-Chinese materials.

But investors should be careful.

Rare-earth projects can take years to permit, finance and build.

Why Higher Prices Are Not Always Good

A supply shortage can push rare-earth prices higher.

That may help existing producers.

But very high prices can also encourage:

new supply + recycling + substitution + product redesign

The sector is therefore still cyclical.

A company may appear extremely valuable during a shortage, only for prices to weaken once new production arrives.

This is why investors need to distinguish between:

temporary scarcity

and

sustainable competitive advantage

Can the U.S. Reduce Its Dependence on China?

Yes, but not quickly.

The United States is expanding domestic mining and processing, financing new projects and building strategic inventories.

However, refining remains a major bottleneck.

The IEA expects global demand for critical minerals to at least double by 2040, which means new supply must grow while demand is also rising.

That makes diversification harder.

The challenge is not simply replacing today’s Chinese supply.

It is building enough new supply for tomorrow’s larger market.

What Could Ease the Risk?

Several developments could reduce pressure:

Improved U.S.–China trade relations
More predictable export licences could improve supply.

New Western refining capacity
Additional processing outside China would reduce concentration.

Recycling
Recovering rare earths from existing products could supplement mining.

Material substitution
Companies may redesign products to use fewer constrained elements.

But all of these solutions require time.

What Should Investors Watch?

The most useful signals are Chinese export controls, rare-earth prices, U.S.–China negotiations, new mining projects, refining capacity and defense procurement.

The central issue is simple:

Rare earths are inexpensive compared with many finished products, but without them those products may be impossible to manufacture.

That gives relatively small parts of the global commodity market enormous strategic importance.

For technology and defense companies, supply security may therefore matter just as much as the price of the material itself.

And for rare earth stocks, the key question is whether global diversification creates sustainable demand for new producers—or simply a temporary investment boom.

Analyze Macro Trends With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro tools help users study changing supply-chain risks, economic regimes and market trends rather than reacting to individual geopolitical headlines.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Samsung, SK Hynix and OpenAI: Why Memory Chips Are Becoming an AI Bottleneck

    The AI chip race is no longer only about GPUs. Memory is becoming one of the industry’s biggest bottlenecks. OpenAI is deepening cooperation with Samsung Electronics and already has agreements with both Samsung and SK Hynix for memory used in its Stargate AI infrastructure. At the same time, shortages of high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, are…

  • Qualcomm vs Nvidia: Can Amazon’s $60 Billion AI Chip Deal Change the Race?

    Qualcomm just gained one of its biggest opportunities yet to challenge the AI-chip leaders. Amazon has entered a long-term partnership with Qualcomm covering custom AI data-center chips and high-speed optical connectivity. Under the agreement, Amazon could purchase up to $60 billion of Qualcomm products and services over time. That does not mean Qualcomm suddenly replaces…

  • ASML’s $400 Million High-NA Machines: Why They Matter to the AI Chip Race

    The next generation of AI chips may depend on machines costing as much as $400 million each. They are called High-NA EUV lithography systems, and only one company makes them: ASML. TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix and Intel are all moving toward High-NA adoption as chipmakers push toward smaller, faster and more power-efficient semiconductors. The question…

  • China Credit Slowdown: Why Weak Loan Demand Matters forAsian Stocks

    China’s banks are lending again—but borrowers are still reluctant to take on debt. Chinese banks issued just 60 billion yuan of new loans in August 2026, far below market expectations of around 400 billion yuan. Household borrowing also contracted for a sixth consecutive month. That matters far beyond China’s banking system. Weak credit demand can…

  • China Property Reset: Can Beijing Stabilize Four Million Unsold Homes?

    China is trying to reset its property market after years of falling prices, developer failures and weak buyer confidence. The challenge is enormous. China is still dealing with millions of unsold and unfinished homes, while new-home prices fell again in August 2026. The key question is: Can Beijing reduce excess housing supply fast enough to…

  • Why S-REITs Are Raising Billions in 2026—and What Dilution Means for Investors

    Singapore REITs are raising billions of dollars again. By September 10, S-REITs had raised at least S$4.5 billion through equity fundraising in 2026, exceeding the amount raised during the same period last year. The money is largely being used to buy new properties and expand portfolios. But issuing new units creates an important question: Does…

  • S-REIT Yield Spread Explained: Why a 6% Yield Is Not Automatically Cheap

    Singapore REITs currently offer attractive headline income. But a high yield does not automatically mean a REIT is cheap. S-REITs yield about 6.2% on average, while Singapore’s 10-year government bond yield is around 2.36%. That leaves a sizeable income premium for taking REIT risk. The important question is: Is that extra yield compensation for an…

  • DBS vs OCBC vs UOB: Why Singapore Banks React Differently to Interest Rates

    DBS, OCBC and UOB are all major Singapore banks—but interest-rate changes do not affect them in exactly the same way. Higher rates can improve lending margins. Lower rates can squeeze them. But today’s banks also earn heavily from: That means the real question is: Which bank is most dependent on interest income—and which has the…

  • Singapore’s AI Chip Supply Chain: The Stocks Behind the Semiconductor Boom

    Singapore does not have its own Nvidia or TSMC—but it occupies several increasingly valuable parts of the global AI chip supply chain. The city-state specializes in areas such as: Those activities become more important as AI chips grow more complex and expensive. Singapore secured about S$30 billion of semiconductor investment between 2022 and 2025, and…