Oracle’s $18 Billion AI Data-Center Debt: Is the AI Buildout Becoming Too Leveraged?

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Oracle stock is becoming a major test of whether the AI infrastructure boom is taking on too much debt.

Around $18 billion of loans linked to Oracle’s planned Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico are now trading below their original value.

The problem is simple:

AI demand is booming—but building the infrastructure requires enormous amounts of capital.

What Is Project Jupiter?

Project Jupiter is a huge AI data-center development planned in New Mexico.

The project is connected to Oracle’s expanding cloud partnership with OpenAI and forms part of the infrastructure needed to run increasingly powerful AI models.

Banks including Santander and Jefferies helped arrange roughly $18 billion of financing.

But those loans are now being quoted at around 89 to 91 cents on the dollar, showing investors want a discount before taking the risk.

Why Is the Debt Under Pressure?

There are several concerns.

Oracle is already borrowing heavily to finance its AI expansion.

Reuters reported that Oracle had around $129.5 billion of debt and roughly $260 billion of long-term data-center lease commitments earlier this year.

At the same time, free cash flow has weakened because infrastructure spending is rising rapidly.

That creates a difficult equation:

more AI investment → more future revenue potential → more debt today

Investors now want proof that the future revenue will justify the financing.

Oracle Is Close to Junk Status

Credit-rating agencies are becoming more cautious.

S&P downgraded Oracle to BBB-, only one level above speculative-grade or “junk” status.

That matters because a further downgrade could make borrowing more expensive.

Higher interest costs would make the economics of future data-center projects less attractive.

For a company spending tens of billions on infrastructure, even a small increase in financing costs can become significant.

The New Mexico Project Has Other Problems

Debt is not the only issue.

Project Jupiter also faces local opposition over:

  • water consumption
  • air pollution
  • power generation
  • environmental permits

Plans for a natural-gas pipeline serving the facility’s proposed 2.2 gigawatts of gas-powered generation have faced regulatory difficulties.

Delays matter because debt continues to cost money even when a project is not producing revenue.

That increases execution risk.

Why OpenAI Matters

Oracle’s AI expansion is closely tied to expected demand from OpenAI.

That creates enormous potential—but also concentration risk.

Reuters has reported that about half of Oracle’s huge future revenue backlog is linked to OpenAI-related business.

OpenAI itself is spending heavily.

The company reportedly expects cumulative cash burn of around $278 billion between 2026 and 2030 as it expands computing capacity.

That means the AI infrastructure ecosystem increasingly depends on several companies continuing to raise enormous amounts of capital.

Is the AI Boom Becoming Too Leveraged?

Not necessarily—but the financing structure is changing.

Earlier AI growth was largely funded by cash-rich technology giants.

Increasingly, the industry is using:

corporate debt + project loans + leases + private credit

to fund data centers, power infrastructure and chips.

Global AI infrastructure spending is expected to approach $795 billion in 2026 and could exceed $1 trillion next year.

As those numbers grow, lenders will become more selective.

What Should Investors Watch?

Watch Oracle debt, free cash flow, credit ratings, AI capital spending and Project Jupiter delays.

The key question is:

Can Oracle’s AI revenue grow fast enough to justify the debt needed to build the infrastructure?

If revenue and cash flow catch up, the leverage may look manageable.

If projects are delayed or AI spending slows, debt could become a much bigger problem for Oracle stock.

Track AI Infrastructure Risk With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro and Risk tools help users study changing technology spending, financial conditions and market risk.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Moving Average 10 Explained: What MA10 Shows in TrendAnalysis

    The 10-period moving average (MA10) is a short-term trend reference that smooths recent price action and helps show whether price is trading above, below, or repeatedly crossing its nearby trend. On a daily chart, MA10 usually represents the most recent 10 trading sessions. Its main purpose is simple: Is short-term price action holding above an…

  • Monte Carlo Simulation in Trading

    Monte Carlo simulation helps traders and investors study many possible market outcomes instead of relying on one forecast. Rather than asking: “Where will this asset be in the future?” Monte Carlo analysis asks: “Across many simulated paths, what range of returns, drawdowns and downside outcomes could occur?” Inside TradingSimuLab, Monte Carlo-style analysis powers Risk Simulation,…

  • Monte Carlo Simulation in Trading

    Monte Carlo simulation is a way to study many possible market paths instead of relying on one forecast. In trading and investment risk analysis, it can help answer questions such as: TradingSimuLab uses Monte Carlo-style path analysis inside Risk Simulation to provide context around expected return, probability of gain, simulated ranges, VaR, CVaR, maximum drawdown…

  • Max Drawdown Explained

    Maximum drawdown is one of the simplest ways to understand how painful an investment path can become. A portfolio can finish with a positive return and still experience a severe decline along the way. That is what maximum drawdown, often shortened to max drawdown or MDD, measures. It answers: What was the largest peak-to-trough decline…

  • Macro Scenario Payoff Table Explained

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Scenario Payoff Table connects the broader macro outlook with the historical behavior of the selected asset. It answers three questions: How likely is each macro scenario? How did this asset historically perform after similar macro conditions? How much does each scenario contribute to Macro Expected Value? This is important because a weak macro…

  • Macro Net Score and Confidence Explained

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Net Score and Model Confidence answer two different questions: Net Macro Score: Does the current macro backdrop lean constructive, defensive, or mixed? Model Confidence: How clear and internally consistent is that macro read? The distinction matters. A macro outlook can be positive but uncertain. It can also be negative with relatively high confidence…

  • Macro Model Workflow With Risk, Trend and Timing

    A macro outlook is useful, but it should not make the entire market decision. TradingSimuLab uses the Macro Model as the 12-month backdrop layer of a broader five-model research workflow. The process is designed to answer five different questions: The purpose is not to make five models produce the same answer. It is to identify…

  • Macro Model Explained: How to Read Net Score, 12-Month Outlook and Scenario Probabilities

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Model is the long-horizon context layer of the five-model framework. It is designed to answer: Does the broader 12-month market backdrop look constructive, defensive, or mixed? Instead of relying on one economic indicator, the model combines broader macro and market context and summarizes the result through several outputs: The Macro Model is deliberately…

  • Macro Expected Value Explained

    Macro Expected Value, or Macro EV, is TradingSimuLab’s probability-weighted estimate of how an asset historically behaved across the Macro Model’s possible scenarios. In simple terms: Macro EV combines how likely each macro scenario appears with the asset’s historical payoff after similar model-defined conditions. It answers: If several macro outcomes remain possible, what does the probability-weighted…