Oracle’s $18 Billion AI Data-Center Debt: Is the AI Buildout Becoming Too Leveraged?

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Oracle stock is becoming a major test of whether the AI infrastructure boom is taking on too much debt.

Around $18 billion of loans linked to Oracle’s planned Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico are now trading below their original value.

The problem is simple:

AI demand is booming—but building the infrastructure requires enormous amounts of capital.

What Is Project Jupiter?

Project Jupiter is a huge AI data-center development planned in New Mexico.

The project is connected to Oracle’s expanding cloud partnership with OpenAI and forms part of the infrastructure needed to run increasingly powerful AI models.

Banks including Santander and Jefferies helped arrange roughly $18 billion of financing.

But those loans are now being quoted at around 89 to 91 cents on the dollar, showing investors want a discount before taking the risk.

Why Is the Debt Under Pressure?

There are several concerns.

Oracle is already borrowing heavily to finance its AI expansion.

Reuters reported that Oracle had around $129.5 billion of debt and roughly $260 billion of long-term data-center lease commitments earlier this year.

At the same time, free cash flow has weakened because infrastructure spending is rising rapidly.

That creates a difficult equation:

more AI investment → more future revenue potential → more debt today

Investors now want proof that the future revenue will justify the financing.

Oracle Is Close to Junk Status

Credit-rating agencies are becoming more cautious.

S&P downgraded Oracle to BBB-, only one level above speculative-grade or “junk” status.

That matters because a further downgrade could make borrowing more expensive.

Higher interest costs would make the economics of future data-center projects less attractive.

For a company spending tens of billions on infrastructure, even a small increase in financing costs can become significant.

The New Mexico Project Has Other Problems

Debt is not the only issue.

Project Jupiter also faces local opposition over:

  • water consumption
  • air pollution
  • power generation
  • environmental permits

Plans for a natural-gas pipeline serving the facility’s proposed 2.2 gigawatts of gas-powered generation have faced regulatory difficulties.

Delays matter because debt continues to cost money even when a project is not producing revenue.

That increases execution risk.

Why OpenAI Matters

Oracle’s AI expansion is closely tied to expected demand from OpenAI.

That creates enormous potential—but also concentration risk.

Reuters has reported that about half of Oracle’s huge future revenue backlog is linked to OpenAI-related business.

OpenAI itself is spending heavily.

The company reportedly expects cumulative cash burn of around $278 billion between 2026 and 2030 as it expands computing capacity.

That means the AI infrastructure ecosystem increasingly depends on several companies continuing to raise enormous amounts of capital.

Is the AI Boom Becoming Too Leveraged?

Not necessarily—but the financing structure is changing.

Earlier AI growth was largely funded by cash-rich technology giants.

Increasingly, the industry is using:

corporate debt + project loans + leases + private credit

to fund data centers, power infrastructure and chips.

Global AI infrastructure spending is expected to approach $795 billion in 2026 and could exceed $1 trillion next year.

As those numbers grow, lenders will become more selective.

What Should Investors Watch?

Watch Oracle debt, free cash flow, credit ratings, AI capital spending and Project Jupiter delays.

The key question is:

Can Oracle’s AI revenue grow fast enough to justify the debt needed to build the infrastructure?

If revenue and cash flow catch up, the leverage may look manageable.

If projects are delayed or AI spending slows, debt could become a much bigger problem for Oracle stock.

Track AI Infrastructure Risk With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro and Risk tools help users study changing technology spending, financial conditions and market risk.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Earnings Revisions Explained: Why Analyst Forecast Changes Can Move Stocks Before Earnings

    Stocks do not wait for earnings day to react. Analysts constantly update forecasts for: When those estimates change, investor expectations change too. That is why a stock can rise or fall weeks before the company actually reports earnings. These changes are called earnings revisions. Educational research only. This article is not investment advice. What Are…

  • Gap Up vs Breakout: Why a Big Overnight Jump Can Still Become a Fakeout

    A stock can open sharply higher and still finish the day looking weak. That is because a gap up is not automatically a confirmed breakout. A gap tells you that price moved significantly between one session’s close and the next session’s open. A breakout tells you that price has moved beyond an important level. The…

  • Relative Strength Explained: How to Find Market Leaders Without Chasing Hype

    Relative Strength Explained: How to Find Market Leaders Without Chasing Hype Some stocks rise faster than the market. Others lag even when the index is strong. Relative strength helps identify that difference. It asks: Is this stock outperforming or underperforming its benchmark? That can help investors spot market leadership. But strong relative performance does not…

  • Credit Spreads Explained: An Early Warning Signal for Stocks and the Economy

    Credit spreads can reveal financial stress before it becomes obvious in the stock market. When investors become worried about companies repaying debt, they demand more compensation for holding corporate bonds. That extra compensation is the credit spread. The simple idea is: Narrow spreads = greater confidence. Wider spreads = greater concern about risk. That makes…

  • Stock Market Concentration Risk: What Happens When a Few Mega-Caps Drive the Index?

    The S&P 500 contains 500 companies—but they do not all matter equally. A small group of mega-cap technology companies can account for a huge share of the index. In 2026, the Magnificent Seven still represent roughly one-third of the S&P 500’s weight. That creates an important risk: An index can look diversified while its performance…

  • AI Power and Cooling Stocks: The Hidden Infrastructure Trade Behind the Data Center Boom

    The AI boom is creating winners far beyond Nvidia and semiconductor stocks. Every AI data center also needs: That is creating a second AI investment theme: power and cooling infrastructure. The opportunity is real. But after sharp stock-price gains, investors also need to ask: Is the trend still healthy—or becoming overextended? That is where TradingSimuLab’s…

  • AI Data Center Power Crunch: Can Electricity Supply Keep Up With AI Demand?

    AI may be running into a surprisingly old-fashioned problem: electricity. Building more AI models requires more GPUs. More GPUs require more data centers. And more data centers require enormous amounts of: The AI race is therefore becoming a power-infrastructure race. The key question is: Can electricity supply expand quickly enough to keep up with AI…

  • Market Liquidity Explained: Why Prices Move Fast When Buyers Disappear

    Markets can move violently even without a huge change in fundamentals. Sometimes the problem is simply: there are not enough buyers. This is a liquidity problem. Market liquidity describes how easily an asset can be bought or sold without causing a large change in price. When liquidity is strong, trades are absorbed smoothly. When liquidity…

  • Why Correlations Rise During Market Crashes—and Diversification Can Fail

    Diversification is supposed to reduce risk. But during severe market selloffs, something uncomfortable can happen: assets that normally move differently can suddenly start falling together. This is known as correlation convergence. It helps explain why a portfolio that looks diversified in normal markets can experience much larger losses during a crisis. Educational research only. This…