Oracle’s $18 Billion AI Data-Center Debt: Is the AI Buildout Becoming Too Leveraged?

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Oracle stock is becoming a major test of whether the AI infrastructure boom is taking on too much debt.

Around $18 billion of loans linked to Oracle’s planned Project Jupiter data center in New Mexico are now trading below their original value.

The problem is simple:

AI demand is booming—but building the infrastructure requires enormous amounts of capital.

What Is Project Jupiter?

Project Jupiter is a huge AI data-center development planned in New Mexico.

The project is connected to Oracle’s expanding cloud partnership with OpenAI and forms part of the infrastructure needed to run increasingly powerful AI models.

Banks including Santander and Jefferies helped arrange roughly $18 billion of financing.

But those loans are now being quoted at around 89 to 91 cents on the dollar, showing investors want a discount before taking the risk.

Why Is the Debt Under Pressure?

There are several concerns.

Oracle is already borrowing heavily to finance its AI expansion.

Reuters reported that Oracle had around $129.5 billion of debt and roughly $260 billion of long-term data-center lease commitments earlier this year.

At the same time, free cash flow has weakened because infrastructure spending is rising rapidly.

That creates a difficult equation:

more AI investment → more future revenue potential → more debt today

Investors now want proof that the future revenue will justify the financing.

Oracle Is Close to Junk Status

Credit-rating agencies are becoming more cautious.

S&P downgraded Oracle to BBB-, only one level above speculative-grade or “junk” status.

That matters because a further downgrade could make borrowing more expensive.

Higher interest costs would make the economics of future data-center projects less attractive.

For a company spending tens of billions on infrastructure, even a small increase in financing costs can become significant.

The New Mexico Project Has Other Problems

Debt is not the only issue.

Project Jupiter also faces local opposition over:

  • water consumption
  • air pollution
  • power generation
  • environmental permits

Plans for a natural-gas pipeline serving the facility’s proposed 2.2 gigawatts of gas-powered generation have faced regulatory difficulties.

Delays matter because debt continues to cost money even when a project is not producing revenue.

That increases execution risk.

Why OpenAI Matters

Oracle’s AI expansion is closely tied to expected demand from OpenAI.

That creates enormous potential—but also concentration risk.

Reuters has reported that about half of Oracle’s huge future revenue backlog is linked to OpenAI-related business.

OpenAI itself is spending heavily.

The company reportedly expects cumulative cash burn of around $278 billion between 2026 and 2030 as it expands computing capacity.

That means the AI infrastructure ecosystem increasingly depends on several companies continuing to raise enormous amounts of capital.

Is the AI Boom Becoming Too Leveraged?

Not necessarily—but the financing structure is changing.

Earlier AI growth was largely funded by cash-rich technology giants.

Increasingly, the industry is using:

corporate debt + project loans + leases + private credit

to fund data centers, power infrastructure and chips.

Global AI infrastructure spending is expected to approach $795 billion in 2026 and could exceed $1 trillion next year.

As those numbers grow, lenders will become more selective.

What Should Investors Watch?

Watch Oracle debt, free cash flow, credit ratings, AI capital spending and Project Jupiter delays.

The key question is:

Can Oracle’s AI revenue grow fast enough to justify the debt needed to build the infrastructure?

If revenue and cash flow catch up, the leverage may look manageable.

If projects are delayed or AI spending slows, debt could become a much bigger problem for Oracle stock.

Track AI Infrastructure Risk With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro and Risk tools help users study changing technology spending, financial conditions and market risk.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Falling AI Token Costs: Why Cheaper AI Could Drive Another Wave of Chip Demand

    AI is becoming dramatically cheaper to use. That could create more—not less—demand for chips. Silicon Data’s benchmark for the cost of one million AI tokens stood at about $0.97 on August 31, down from roughly $2.07 in May. That is a decline of more than 50% in only a few months. The important question is:…

  • Singapore STI Watch: Why Banks, Shipbuilders and Semiconductor Stocks Are Driving the Market

    Singapore stocks have had a powerful 2026—but the strength is not evenly spread across the market. The Straits Times Index closed at 5,718.02 on September 14, gaining 0.4% for the session. Yangzijiang Shipbuilding led the blue-chip gainers, while DBS, OCBC and UOB all finished higher. Yet across the wider market, 312 stocks fell versus 235…

  • Singapore Data Center REITs Bet on Japan: Is Power Scarcity Creating a New Growth Trade?

    Singapore-listed data center REITs are increasing their exposure to Japan as AI and cloud demand collide with a shortage of power-ready facilities. Keppel DC REIT recently proposed buying two Tokyo data centers, while Digital Core REIT increased its stake in an Osaka facility. The opportunity looks attractive. But the same power shortage supporting asset values…

  • SGX Crypto Perpetual Futures: What Singapore’s Institutional Crypto Push Means for Bitcoin and Ether

    Singapore Exchange is pushing deeper into institutional crypto trading. SGX already offers Bitcoin and Ethereum perpetual futures, launched in November 2025. Now it is preparing to offer those contracts to U.S. institutional investors, after filing with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in August 2026. That matters because perpetual futures have traditionally been dominated by crypto-native…

  • S-REITs vs Singapore Banks: Where Is the Better Yield in 2026?

    Singapore income investors have an interesting choice in 2026: S-REITs or bank stocks? S-REITs currently yield about 6.2% on average, compared with roughly 4% for Singapore’s three major banks—DBS, OCBC and UOB. That makes REITs look more attractive on headline yield. But yield alone does not tell you which investment offers the better risk-reward. Educational…

  • Singapore Semiconductor Stocks Rally: Can AEM, UMS and Frencken Keep Running?

    Singapore semiconductor stocks have become some of the SGX’s strongest performers in 2026. AEM, UMS Integration and Frencken have surged as investors bet that artificial intelligence will drive another wave of semiconductor spending. The Business Times reported that the three stocks had gained roughly 65% to more than 400% this year by early September. The…

  • Position Sizing Explained: Why Managing Risk Can Matter More Than Predicting the Market

    You can be right about a stock and still lose too much money. You can also be wrong several times and still preserve your portfolio. The difference often comes down to position sizing. Position sizing means deciding how much capital to allocate to a trade or investment. It is one of the simplest ways to…

  • Drawdown Recovery Explained: Why a 50% Loss Requires a 100% Gain

    Large losses are harder to recover from than many investors realize. If an investment falls 50%, it does not need a 50% gain to recover. It needs a 100% gain. That is because the recovery starts from a much smaller base. This simple idea is one of the most important lessons in risk management. Educational…

  • Sector Rotation Explained: Why Market Leadership Changes When Rates and Inflation Move

    The strongest part of the stock market does not stay the same forever. Technology may lead for months. Then energy, banks, industrials or defensive sectors can take over. This change in leadership is called sector rotation. It happens because different industries respond differently to: Understanding sector rotation can help explain why the overall market may…