Stablecoins in Latin America: Why USDT and USDC Are Becoming Digital Dollars

Stablecoins are becoming one of Latin America’s most important crypto use cases.

In 2025, dollar-linked stablecoins such as USDT and USDC accounted for 40% of crypto purchases on Bitso, compared with 18% for Bitcoin.

The reason is simple.

For many users, stablecoins are not primarily a bet on crypto prices.

They are a way to access digital U.S. dollars.

Educational research only. This article is not investment advice.

What Is a Stablecoin?

A stablecoin is a digital token designed to maintain a relatively stable value.

The most widely used dollar stablecoins include:

USDT — Tether

USDC — USD Coin

Both aim to remain close to:

1 token ≈ US$1

Unlike Bitcoin, their purpose is not large price appreciation.

They are designed primarily for:

  • storing dollar-linked value;
  • transferring money;
  • trading;
  • payments;
  • cross-border settlement.

That makes them particularly relevant in economies where local currencies can be volatile.

Why Stablecoins Are Growing in Latin America

Latin America combines several conditions that can make digital dollars attractive:

  • currency volatility;
  • inflation;
  • demand for U.S. dollars;
  • large remittance flows;
  • expensive cross-border payments.

Chainalysis estimates Latin America processed nearly $1.5 trillion in cryptocurrency transactions between July 2022 and June 2025.

It also found stablecoin purchases represented more than half of exchange purchases involving the Argentine peso, Brazilian real and Colombian peso during part of 2024–2025.

The basic appeal is:

Local Currency → Stablecoin → Dollar-Linked Value

Argentina Shows the Trend Clearly

Argentina provides one of the strongest examples.

Bitso found that in the first half of 2025:

USDT represented 78% of Argentine crypto purchases.

USDC added another 7%.

That meant approximately 85% of crypto purchases in Argentina were digital dollars.

This reflects Argentina’s long-standing preference for saving in U.S. dollars during periods of peso instability.

Stablecoins can provide access without requiring users to hold physical dollar notes.

Brazil, Mexico and Colombia Are Growing Too

The trend is broader than Argentina.

Bitso’s first-half 2025 data showed stablecoins represented roughly:

  • 35% of purchases in Brazil
  • 43% in Colombia
  • 36% in Mexico

Brazil is particularly important.

Chainalysis estimated Brazil received about $318.8 billion in crypto value during its latest regional study period, making it the largest crypto market in Latin America.

Stablecoins are increasingly part of payments, treasury management and cross-border transactions there.

Why Businesses Use Stablecoins

The use case is not limited to individuals.

Bitso Business reported that stablecoin adoption among its institutional clients doubled from the second half of 2024 to the first half of 2025.

FX, treasury management and arbitrage together accounted for approximately 45% of processed institutional volume.

Companies can potentially use stablecoins to:

  • settle international payments;
  • move funds between countries;
  • manage dollar liquidity;
  • reduce settlement delays;
  • operate outside banking hours.

This is why stablecoins are increasingly described as financial infrastructure, rather than simply another cryptocurrency.

Stablecoins Are Not the Same as Bank Dollars

This distinction is crucial.

Holding USDT or USDC is not identical to holding dollars in an insured bank account.

Stablecoin users face additional risks.

Issuer Risk

The token depends on the company responsible for maintaining its reserves and redemption structure.

Depeg Risk

A stablecoin can temporarily trade below or above $1.

Custody Risk

Tokens can be lost through compromised wallets, exchanges or private keys.

Regulatory Risk

Governments can change the rules surrounding stablecoin issuance and use.

Blockchain Risk

Transfers depend on blockchain networks, which may experience congestion, fees or technical problems.

Digital dollars can therefore be useful without being risk-free.

Stablecoins vs Bitcoin

Bitcoin and stablecoins serve different purposes.

Bitcoin
Primarily offers exposure to a scarce, volatile digital asset.

Stablecoins
Primarily aim to preserve dollar-linked purchasing power and liquidity.

Bitso’s 2025 data demonstrates this distinction well.

Stablecoins led new purchases, while Bitcoin still represented around 52% of crypto portfolio holdings across the region.

Users can therefore hold Bitcoin for longer-term exposure while using stablecoins for day-to-day dollar liquidity.

How Risk Simulation Fits

TradingSimuLab’s Risk Simulation framework encourages investors to consider downside as well as convenience.

For crypto assets, useful questions include:

VaR
How severe could losses become during stressed markets?

CVaR
What happens beyond the normal downside threshold?

Max Drawdown
How large could peak-to-trough losses become?

Stablecoins normally have far lower price volatility than Bitcoin.

But their risks are different.

Instead of focusing only on price volatility, users must consider:

Issuer + Custody + Liquidity + Depeg + Regulatory Risk

We are not assigning live TradingSimuLab risk scores here.

Final Takeaway

Stablecoin adoption in Latin America is growing because many users want something very familiar:

access to U.S. dollars.

The difference is the infrastructure.

The emerging chain is:

Local Currency → Digital Dollars → Savings + Payments + Cross-Border Transfers

USDT and USDC may therefore be more useful to many Latin American users as financial tools than as speculative investments.

The key question is not:

“Will a stablecoin rise in price?”

It is:

“Can digital dollars provide cheaper, faster and reliable access to dollar-linked value without introducing unacceptable new risks?”

For more Latin American market research, crypto risk analysis and model-based insights, sign up to TradingSimuLab and explore the platform.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • IPO Valuation Explained: Why New Stocks Often Need to Be Sold at a Discount

    A private company may believe it is worth $20 billion. Public-market investors may disagree. That gap is one of the biggest challenges in IPO valuation. The U.S. IPO market recently slowed as higher bond yields reduced risk appetite. Reuters reported that only four companies had gone public after Labor Day by September 25, while investors…

  • Biotech Licensing Deals: Why Pharma Pays Billions for Unapproved Drugs

    Pharmaceutical companies sometimes agree to deals worth billions for drugs that have never reached the market. That sounds risky. It is. But biotech licensing deals are usually designed so that much of the money is paid only if the drug succeeds. Novo Nordisk recently agreed to pay China’s Hengrui $300 million upfront for rights to…

  • Rare Earth Stocks: Why Tiny Metals Can Shut Down Huge Industries

    Some of the world’s most important supply chains depend on materials produced in surprisingly small quantities. That is why rare earth stocks have become a major strategic investment theme. Yttrium is a good example. The metal is used in aerospace engines, power equipment and semiconductor manufacturing tools, yet it has few easy substitutes. Chinese export…

  • Defense Stocks Explained: Why Huge Government Contracts Do Not Become Profits Overnight

    A $20 billion defense contract sounds like $20 billion of business. But it does not mean $20 billion of immediate revenue or profit. RTX’s Raytheon recently received a multiyear AMRAAM missile contract valued at up to $20.7 billion. The agreement is designed to raise annual production to at least 1,900 missiles as the U.S. and…

  • Term Premium Explained: Why Long-Term Bond Yields Can Rise Without More Fed Hikes

    Long-term bond yields can rise even if investors do not expect the Federal Reserve to keep raising rates forever. The missing piece is the term premium. The New York Fed defines the term premium as the extra compensation investors require for holding a longer-term Treasury rather than repeatedly investing in short-term bonds. That matters now…

  • Treasury Basis Trade Explained: Why Hedge Funds Borrow Billions for Tiny Profits

    Some hedge funds borrow enormous amounts of money to earn very small profits in the U.S. Treasury market. That strategy is known as the Treasury basis trade. The trade has recently become less attractive. Reuters reports that assets tied to leveraged basis strategies fell about 20% in 2026 to roughly $1.2 trillion, as higher rates,…

  • Treasury Auction Explained: What Happens When Investors Do Not Want Government Bonds?

    The U.S. government constantly needs to borrow money. It does that by selling Treasury bills, notes and bonds through a Treasury auction. Most auctions attract plenty of buyers. But when demand is weak, something important happens: investors demand a higher yield before lending money to the government. A weak $70 billion U.S. five-year Treasury auction…

  • Corporate Bond Spreads Explained: Why Strong AI Companies Can Still Pay More to Borrow

    A strong company does not always get a cheap bond. That is one of the most important lessons behind corporate bond spreads. AI-related companies are issuing enormous amounts of debt to fund data centers, chips and infrastructure. Reuters reports that investors are becoming more selective as the market absorbs that supply. AI-linked bonds have recently…

  • Stock Buybacks Explained: When Repurchases Create Value and When They Waste Cash

    A company buying its own shares sounds automatically bullish. It is not. Stock buybacks can create significant shareholder value when a company has excess cash and its shares are attractively valued. But buying overpriced stock can destroy value just as easily. Nvidia recently increased its buyback authorization by a record $150 billion, taking its remaining…