Rare Earths Explained: Why U.S.–China Supply Tensions Matter for Tech and Defense Stocks

Educational research only — not investment advice.

Rare earth stocks are attracting attention again as tensions between the United States and China expose a major weakness in global technology and defense supply chains.

Rare earth elements are used in everything from semiconductors and electric vehicles to radar systems, missiles and aircraft.

The problem is concentration.

China accounted for roughly 85% of global rare-earth refining in 2025, giving it enormous influence over how these materials reach global manufacturers.

That makes rare earths much more than a mining story.

They are increasingly a technology, defense and geopolitical supply-chain issue.

What Are Rare Earths?

Rare earths are a group of metallic elements with unusual magnetic, electrical and heat-resistant properties.

They are often used in very small quantities, but those small quantities can be essential.

Important examples include:

  • neodymium
  • dysprosium
  • terbium
  • yttrium
  • samarium

Many are used to manufacture powerful permanent magnets or specialized components.

That means a relatively small disruption in supply can affect a much larger finished product.

Why Does China Matter So Much?

The main issue is not simply where rare-earth minerals are mined.

Processing and refining are even more important.

China has spent decades building expertise and industrial capacity across the rare-earth supply chain.

Even after new U.S. and Malaysian investment, China’s share of global rare-earth refining only fell from more than 90% in 2023 to around 85% in 2025. The International Energy Agency estimates that China could still control roughly 70%–73% of refining in 2035 even if planned global projects are completed.

That means diversification will take years.

Why Are U.S.–China Tensions Important?

Rare earths have increasingly become part of trade negotiations.

Some Chinese suppliers have recently refused to ship rare-earth materials to U.S. companies because they fear becoming caught between American and Chinese restrictions.

Reuters reports that U.S. companies in aerospace, semiconductors and other sensitive industries are still struggling to obtain some materials.

Rare-earth access is expected to be discussed when U.S. President Donald Trump meets Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington on September 24.

The market risk is straightforward:

export restrictions → lower supply → higher prices → production delays

Why Tech Companies Care

Rare earths and related critical minerals appear throughout the technology supply chain.

They can be found in:

  • advanced electronics
  • semiconductor equipment
  • data centers
  • electric motors
  • smartphones
  • renewable-energy systems

Yttrium, for example, is used in semiconductor and aerospace applications, while rare-earth magnets are essential in many high-performance motors.

A shortage does not necessarily stop production immediately.

But companies may need to:

  • pay higher prices
  • hold larger inventories
  • redesign products
  • qualify alternative suppliers

All of those responses can raise costs.

Why Defense Stocks Are Especially Exposed

Defense supply chains have even less room for substitution.

Heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium are used in high-performance magnets needed for applications including fighter aircraft, missile guidance and radar systems.

That makes supply security strategically important.

Lockheed Martin has already been exploring purchases of critical minerals from U.S. mines as Washington pushes defense contractors to reduce dependence on Chinese supply.

For defense companies, the issue is not simply the price of the raw material.

It is whether enough material is available to maintain production schedules.

Why Rare Earth Stocks Can Benefit

Supply concerns can create opportunities for producers outside China.

If governments and manufacturers want alternative sources, they may support new:

  • mines
  • processing facilities
  • magnet plants
  • long-term supply agreements

The U.S. government has invested directly in companies including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth and other critical-mineral projects as part of efforts to build domestic supply.

This creates potential demand for companies positioned to supply non-Chinese materials.

But investors should be careful.

Rare-earth projects can take years to permit, finance and build.

Why Higher Prices Are Not Always Good

A supply shortage can push rare-earth prices higher.

That may help existing producers.

But very high prices can also encourage:

new supply + recycling + substitution + product redesign

The sector is therefore still cyclical.

A company may appear extremely valuable during a shortage, only for prices to weaken once new production arrives.

This is why investors need to distinguish between:

temporary scarcity

and

sustainable competitive advantage

Can the U.S. Reduce Its Dependence on China?

Yes, but not quickly.

The United States is expanding domestic mining and processing, financing new projects and building strategic inventories.

However, refining remains a major bottleneck.

The IEA expects global demand for critical minerals to at least double by 2040, which means new supply must grow while demand is also rising.

That makes diversification harder.

The challenge is not simply replacing today’s Chinese supply.

It is building enough new supply for tomorrow’s larger market.

What Could Ease the Risk?

Several developments could reduce pressure:

Improved U.S.–China trade relations
More predictable export licences could improve supply.

New Western refining capacity
Additional processing outside China would reduce concentration.

Recycling
Recovering rare earths from existing products could supplement mining.

Material substitution
Companies may redesign products to use fewer constrained elements.

But all of these solutions require time.

What Should Investors Watch?

The most useful signals are Chinese export controls, rare-earth prices, U.S.–China negotiations, new mining projects, refining capacity and defense procurement.

The central issue is simple:

Rare earths are inexpensive compared with many finished products, but without them those products may be impossible to manufacture.

That gives relatively small parts of the global commodity market enormous strategic importance.

For technology and defense companies, supply security may therefore matter just as much as the price of the material itself.

And for rare earth stocks, the key question is whether global diversification creates sustainable demand for new producers—or simply a temporary investment boom.

Analyze Macro Trends With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Macro tools help users study changing supply-chain risks, economic regimes and market trends rather than reacting to individual geopolitical headlines.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Moving Average 10 Explained: What MA10 Shows in TrendAnalysis

    The 10-period moving average (MA10) is a short-term trend reference that smooths recent price action and helps show whether price is trading above, below, or repeatedly crossing its nearby trend. On a daily chart, MA10 usually represents the most recent 10 trading sessions. Its main purpose is simple: Is short-term price action holding above an…

  • Monte Carlo Simulation in Trading

    Monte Carlo simulation helps traders and investors study many possible market outcomes instead of relying on one forecast. Rather than asking: “Where will this asset be in the future?” Monte Carlo analysis asks: “Across many simulated paths, what range of returns, drawdowns and downside outcomes could occur?” Inside TradingSimuLab, Monte Carlo-style analysis powers Risk Simulation,…

  • Monte Carlo Simulation in Trading

    Monte Carlo simulation is a way to study many possible market paths instead of relying on one forecast. In trading and investment risk analysis, it can help answer questions such as: TradingSimuLab uses Monte Carlo-style path analysis inside Risk Simulation to provide context around expected return, probability of gain, simulated ranges, VaR, CVaR, maximum drawdown…

  • Max Drawdown Explained

    Maximum drawdown is one of the simplest ways to understand how painful an investment path can become. A portfolio can finish with a positive return and still experience a severe decline along the way. That is what maximum drawdown, often shortened to max drawdown or MDD, measures. It answers: What was the largest peak-to-trough decline…

  • Macro Scenario Payoff Table Explained

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Scenario Payoff Table connects the broader macro outlook with the historical behavior of the selected asset. It answers three questions: How likely is each macro scenario? How did this asset historically perform after similar macro conditions? How much does each scenario contribute to Macro Expected Value? This is important because a weak macro…

  • Macro Net Score and Confidence Explained

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Net Score and Model Confidence answer two different questions: Net Macro Score: Does the current macro backdrop lean constructive, defensive, or mixed? Model Confidence: How clear and internally consistent is that macro read? The distinction matters. A macro outlook can be positive but uncertain. It can also be negative with relatively high confidence…

  • Macro Model Workflow With Risk, Trend and Timing

    A macro outlook is useful, but it should not make the entire market decision. TradingSimuLab uses the Macro Model as the 12-month backdrop layer of a broader five-model research workflow. The process is designed to answer five different questions: The purpose is not to make five models produce the same answer. It is to identify…

  • Macro Model Explained: How to Read Net Score, 12-Month Outlook and Scenario Probabilities

    TradingSimuLab’s Macro Model is the long-horizon context layer of the five-model framework. It is designed to answer: Does the broader 12-month market backdrop look constructive, defensive, or mixed? Instead of relying on one economic indicator, the model combines broader macro and market context and summarizes the result through several outputs: The Macro Model is deliberately…

  • Macro Expected Value Explained

    Macro Expected Value, or Macro EV, is TradingSimuLab’s probability-weighted estimate of how an asset historically behaved across the Macro Model’s possible scenarios. In simple terms: Macro EV combines how likely each macro scenario appears with the asset’s historical payoff after similar model-defined conditions. It answers: If several macro outcomes remain possible, what does the probability-weighted…