European Luxury Stocks Under Pressure: Can LVMH, Kering and Richemont Recover Without China?

Educational research only — not investment advice.

European luxury stocks remain under pressure as weak Chinese demand challenges one of Europe’s most important industries.

LVMH, Kering and other major luxury groups spent years relying on Chinese consumers for growth.

Now that engine is much weaker.

The key question is:

Can luxury companies grow without a strong China recovery?

Why China Matters So Much

China became one of the most important markets for luxury handbags, watches, jewellery and fashion.

But weak consumer confidence and the long property downturn have reduced spending.

China’s retail sales rose only 0.4% year over year in August, while property investment remained deeply negative.

That matters because luxury spending is highly sensitive to wealth and confidence.

When property values and household confidence weaken, expensive discretionary purchases are easier to postpone.

Luxury Stocks Are Feeling the Pressure

Investors remain cautious.

The STOXX Europe Luxury 10 index was down around 19% year to date in early September.

LVMH shares have fallen even more sharply in 2026, while Kering, Hermès and other luxury names have also faced pressure.

The problem is no longer only China.

Bank of America recently found softer luxury demand across the U.S., Japan, South Korea and other Asian markets as well.

Fashion Looks Weaker Than Jewellery

One important trend is emerging inside the sector.

Fashion and leather goods are struggling more than jewellery.

Consumers have become more resistant to repeated price increases for handbags and clothing.

Bain estimates around 60 million consumers have moved away from luxury goods after years of price rises.

Jewellery has been much stronger.

Richemont, owner of Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, reported 20% sales growth in its latest quarter, while jewellery sales rose 24%.

That suggests customers may currently prefer products they see as more durable or valuable.

Can the U.S. Replace China?

Partially.

U.S. consumers have recently supported several luxury groups.

Kering returned to quarterly growth for the first time in roughly two years, with North America helping offset persistent weakness in China.

But relying too heavily on wealthy U.S. shoppers creates another risk.

Luxury demand is increasingly connected to stock-market and property wealth.

If financial markets weaken, spending by affluent consumers could also slow.

What Would a Real Recovery Look Like?

A stronger luxury recovery would probably need several things:

  • improving Chinese consumer confidence
  • stronger fashion sales
  • fewer aggressive price increases
  • continued U.S. demand
  • better growth from younger consumers

Richemont shows that luxury demand has not disappeared.

But consumers are becoming much more selective.

What Should Investors Watch?

Watch China retail sales, LVMH and Kering fashion growth, Richemont jewellery sales, U.S. luxury spending and sector margins.

The central question is simple:

Can European luxury brands find new growth engines while China remains weak?

If China improves, the sector could regain an important source of demand.

If it does not, companies with stronger exposure to jewellery, wealthy U.S. consumers and resilient brands may continue to perform very differently from weaker fashion businesses.

Track Luxury Trends With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Trend Detector and Risk tools help users study changing sector momentum, market leadership and risk conditions.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • What Is Trend Strength?

    Trend strength describes how organized and convincing a directional market move appears. It answers a simple question: Is price genuinely trending, or is it merely moving? That distinction matters because price can rise or fall sharply without developing stable trend structure. A useful trend-strength read therefore looks beyond direction alone and asks whether the move…

  • VaR vs CVaR Explained

    VaR and CVaR are two downside-risk measures used to understand severe losses. The difference is straightforward: VaR (Value at Risk) = a severe-loss threshold. CVaR (Conditional Value at Risk) = the average loss beyond that threshold. If VaR tells you where the bad tail begins, CVaR helps explain how bad losses become once you are…

  • Trend Velocity and Trend Angle Explained: Reading Persistence Momentum

    Trend Velocity and Trend Angle help show whether trend persistence is improving, weakening, or staying relatively flat. They are slope-style diagnostics inside TradingSimuLab’s Trend Persistence model. The simplest interpretation is: Positive = durability momentum is improving. Negative = durability momentum is weakening. Near zero = persistence is relatively flat. But these readings are not price…

  • Trend Strength Score Explained: How to Read Directional Quality

    Trend Strength Score is TradingSimuLab’s headline measure of current directional quality inside the Trend Detector. It helps answer: Does price currently appear to be moving in an organized, directional way—or is the structure weak, mixed, or noisy? A stronger reading means the current price structure contains more directional evidence. But one rule matters above everything…

  • Trend Regime Quality Explained: Persistent, Exhaustion, Noisy and Mean-Reverting Reads

    A market regime describes the type of price behavior currently dominating a market. Inside TradingSimuLab’s Trend Persistence model, the Regime label translates trend durability into a simpler market-structure state. Depending on the model read, conditions may appear: The purpose is not to predict the next move. It is to answer: What kind of trend environment…

  • Trend Persistence vs Trend Strength: Why Direction and Durability Are Different

    Trend Strength and Trend Persistence measure different qualities of a market trend. The simplest distinction is: Trend Strength: How powerful or directional does the move look now? Trend Persistence: How consistently has that move remained organized over time? A market can therefore have a strong trend but weak persistence if price moved sharply through a…

  • Trend Persistence Explained: Regime, Reversal Warning and Extension Watch

    TradingSimuLab’s Trend Persistence layer helps determine whether a market move has been steady, organized, and durable—or noisy, mean-reverting, and increasingly mature. Its main public indicators are: These metrics answer different questions. Persistence Score: Has the move been steady? Z-Persistence: Is that persistence unusual for this asset? Regime: Is the market behaving persistently, randomly, or mean-reverting?…

  • How to Use Trend Persistence with Timing Model and Risk Simulation

    A trend can look strong without being durable. A durable trend can have poor timing. And a clean trend setup can still carry uncomfortable downside risk. That is why TradingSimuLab separates Trend Persistence, Timing Model, and Risk Simulation. Together, they answer three different questions: Trend Persistence: Is the move organized and durable? Timing Model: Is…

  • Trend Persistence Explained: How to Read Trend Durability, Regime and Reversal Warnings

    TradingSimuLab’s Trend Persistence model measures whether a market move has remained steady, organized, and directional over time. It answers one central question: Is this trend durable—or is the move noisy, unstable, or mean-reverting? That is different from Trend Strength. A move can look powerful today while still having weak persistence if its path has been…