European Luxury Stocks Under Pressure: Can LVMH, Kering and Richemont Recover Without China?

Educational research only — not investment advice.

European luxury stocks remain under pressure as weak Chinese demand challenges one of Europe’s most important industries.

LVMH, Kering and other major luxury groups spent years relying on Chinese consumers for growth.

Now that engine is much weaker.

The key question is:

Can luxury companies grow without a strong China recovery?

Why China Matters So Much

China became one of the most important markets for luxury handbags, watches, jewellery and fashion.

But weak consumer confidence and the long property downturn have reduced spending.

China’s retail sales rose only 0.4% year over year in August, while property investment remained deeply negative.

That matters because luxury spending is highly sensitive to wealth and confidence.

When property values and household confidence weaken, expensive discretionary purchases are easier to postpone.

Luxury Stocks Are Feeling the Pressure

Investors remain cautious.

The STOXX Europe Luxury 10 index was down around 19% year to date in early September.

LVMH shares have fallen even more sharply in 2026, while Kering, Hermès and other luxury names have also faced pressure.

The problem is no longer only China.

Bank of America recently found softer luxury demand across the U.S., Japan, South Korea and other Asian markets as well.

Fashion Looks Weaker Than Jewellery

One important trend is emerging inside the sector.

Fashion and leather goods are struggling more than jewellery.

Consumers have become more resistant to repeated price increases for handbags and clothing.

Bain estimates around 60 million consumers have moved away from luxury goods after years of price rises.

Jewellery has been much stronger.

Richemont, owner of Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, reported 20% sales growth in its latest quarter, while jewellery sales rose 24%.

That suggests customers may currently prefer products they see as more durable or valuable.

Can the U.S. Replace China?

Partially.

U.S. consumers have recently supported several luxury groups.

Kering returned to quarterly growth for the first time in roughly two years, with North America helping offset persistent weakness in China.

But relying too heavily on wealthy U.S. shoppers creates another risk.

Luxury demand is increasingly connected to stock-market and property wealth.

If financial markets weaken, spending by affluent consumers could also slow.

What Would a Real Recovery Look Like?

A stronger luxury recovery would probably need several things:

  • improving Chinese consumer confidence
  • stronger fashion sales
  • fewer aggressive price increases
  • continued U.S. demand
  • better growth from younger consumers

Richemont shows that luxury demand has not disappeared.

But consumers are becoming much more selective.

What Should Investors Watch?

Watch China retail sales, LVMH and Kering fashion growth, Richemont jewellery sales, U.S. luxury spending and sector margins.

The central question is simple:

Can European luxury brands find new growth engines while China remains weak?

If China improves, the sector could regain an important source of demand.

If it does not, companies with stronger exposure to jewellery, wealthy U.S. consumers and resilient brands may continue to perform very differently from weaker fashion businesses.

Track Luxury Trends With TradingSimuLab

TradingSimuLab’s Trend Detector and Risk tools help users study changing sector momentum, market leadership and risk conditions.

For more quantitative market research and educational trading tools, sign up to TradingSimuLab.

TradingSimuLab is for educational and research purposes only and does not provide investment advice.

Continue exploring TradingSimuLab.

  • Samsung, SK Hynix and OpenAI: Why Memory Chips Are Becoming an AI Bottleneck

    The AI chip race is no longer only about GPUs. Memory is becoming one of the industry’s biggest bottlenecks. OpenAI is deepening cooperation with Samsung Electronics and already has agreements with both Samsung and SK Hynix for memory used in its Stargate AI infrastructure. At the same time, shortages of high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, are…

  • Qualcomm vs Nvidia: Can Amazon’s $60 Billion AI Chip Deal Change the Race?

    Qualcomm just gained one of its biggest opportunities yet to challenge the AI-chip leaders. Amazon has entered a long-term partnership with Qualcomm covering custom AI data-center chips and high-speed optical connectivity. Under the agreement, Amazon could purchase up to $60 billion of Qualcomm products and services over time. That does not mean Qualcomm suddenly replaces…

  • ASML’s $400 Million High-NA Machines: Why They Matter to the AI Chip Race

    The next generation of AI chips may depend on machines costing as much as $400 million each. They are called High-NA EUV lithography systems, and only one company makes them: ASML. TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix and Intel are all moving toward High-NA adoption as chipmakers push toward smaller, faster and more power-efficient semiconductors. The question…

  • China Credit Slowdown: Why Weak Loan Demand Matters forAsian Stocks

    China’s banks are lending again—but borrowers are still reluctant to take on debt. Chinese banks issued just 60 billion yuan of new loans in August 2026, far below market expectations of around 400 billion yuan. Household borrowing also contracted for a sixth consecutive month. That matters far beyond China’s banking system. Weak credit demand can…

  • China Property Reset: Can Beijing Stabilize Four Million Unsold Homes?

    China is trying to reset its property market after years of falling prices, developer failures and weak buyer confidence. The challenge is enormous. China is still dealing with millions of unsold and unfinished homes, while new-home prices fell again in August 2026. The key question is: Can Beijing reduce excess housing supply fast enough to…

  • Why S-REITs Are Raising Billions in 2026—and What Dilution Means for Investors

    Singapore REITs are raising billions of dollars again. By September 10, S-REITs had raised at least S$4.5 billion through equity fundraising in 2026, exceeding the amount raised during the same period last year. The money is largely being used to buy new properties and expand portfolios. But issuing new units creates an important question: Does…

  • S-REIT Yield Spread Explained: Why a 6% Yield Is Not Automatically Cheap

    Singapore REITs currently offer attractive headline income. But a high yield does not automatically mean a REIT is cheap. S-REITs yield about 6.2% on average, while Singapore’s 10-year government bond yield is around 2.36%. That leaves a sizeable income premium for taking REIT risk. The important question is: Is that extra yield compensation for an…

  • DBS vs OCBC vs UOB: Why Singapore Banks React Differently to Interest Rates

    DBS, OCBC and UOB are all major Singapore banks—but interest-rate changes do not affect them in exactly the same way. Higher rates can improve lending margins. Lower rates can squeeze them. But today’s banks also earn heavily from: That means the real question is: Which bank is most dependent on interest income—and which has the…

  • Singapore’s AI Chip Supply Chain: The Stocks Behind the Semiconductor Boom

    Singapore does not have its own Nvidia or TSMC—but it occupies several increasingly valuable parts of the global AI chip supply chain. The city-state specializes in areas such as: Those activities become more important as AI chips grow more complex and expensive. Singapore secured about S$30 billion of semiconductor investment between 2022 and 2025, and…